wrote: Beware of marketing departments. Decades ago, we used to buy new things to replace our current stuff because it broke. Over the last couple of decades, marketing departments have worked very hard to convince people to buy replacement stuff because your current stuff is "obsolete", despite The Canon 6D Mark II, should you buy it? Here's 5 reasons you SHOULDN'T!GEAR FROM VIDEO:Canon 6D Mark II: I currently own a 7d with a 24-70 2.8 and want to upgrade to full frame and something a little more modern. Looking at used bodies the 6d mark II comes in around 700 Euro vs the 5d mark III around 500. With the recent announcement of the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, I'm sure many are considering a DSLR upgrade in the not-so-distant future.For those currently shooting with a 5D Mark II or III, the upgrade path is reasonably clear (although the 5Ds and 5Ds R still deserve consideration); however, if a photographer is currently using a Rebel-series or **D model, there are still reasons to consider the Advantages of the EOS 6D Mark II over the 5D Mark III: Dual Pixel AF sensor with Movie Servo AF vs. contrast-detect AF in Live View with no Movie Servo AF; More resolution (26.2 vs. 22.3) DIGIC 7 vs. DIGIC 5+ More sensitive AF (EV -3 – 18 vs. EV -2 – 18) More AF points active at f/8 (27 points vs. center AF point with 4 assist points) JJ Kim from Orange Wedding Films recently took a look at the newer full-frame Canon 6D, along with the APS-C 7D and 60D, and the full-frame 5D Mark II. In the video below, JJ compares their features/specs, as well as image quality and low-light/moire performance. Some more info about the video -- you can skip using the guide below: All the 4nuLK6c.

canon 5d mark iii vs 6d ii